Is it possible to do a git merge, but without a commit? "man git merge" says this: With --no-commit perform the merge but pretend the merge failed and do not autocommit, to give the user a …

87 git merge --no-commit This is just like a normal merge but doesn't create a merge-commit. This commit will be a merge commit: when you look at the history, your commit will appear as a …

To make --no-ff --no-commit the default merge behavior, set the options to no using: git config --global merge.ff no git config --global merge.commit no However, the problem with this is that …

2021年7月20日 · The flag to pass to git merge to have it not commit is called --no-commit (ref). It will do the merge, but stop just short of committing, which you can then do yourself. git merge - …

Instead of cherry-pick, you can do an actual git merge --no-commit, and then manually adjust the index to remove any changes you don't want. Suppose you're on branch A and you want to …

2021年5月14日 · Now you can use git cherry-pick, one commit at a time, to pick up commits from the branch named save-this. When you get to the commit that is a merge, but should not have …

2012年1月30日 · The --no-ff flag prevents git merge from executing a "fast-forward" if it detects that your current HEAD is an ancestor of the commit you're trying to merge. A fast-forward is …

Yes, why not. You will amke git merge --no-commit at first, it merges other_branch with your develop, that you'll remove any files and get changes in index for following commit …

2020年8月11日 · git merge --continue takes no more arguments like --no-commit (fatal: --continue expects no arguments) git merge --continue makes automatic commit and results in below.

2013年2月12日 · git merge commits automatically. If you don't want to commit add the --no-commit argument: --commit, --no-commit Perform the merge and commit the result. This …